Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Lasek for myopia: first results.

Authors: T, Vandorselaer; J J, Hermiat; P, Schraepen; R, Trau; M J, Tassignon;

Lasek for myopia: first results.

Abstract

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) for the treatment of myopia and astigmatism (low, moderate and high).Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy was performed by 3 surgeons in 45 eyes using an INPRO Gauss Excimer laser (31 eyes) or a NIDEK EC-5000 Excimer Laser (14 eyes). The mean follow-up is 9 months (3-15 months). Preoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and corneal topography were measured. The postoperative parameters were: uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), spherical equivalent refraction (SER), defocus equivalent refraction (DER), and corneal topography.The mean preoperative sphere and cylinder were -4.09 diopters (D) +/- 1.94 D (range -1.25 D to -9.75 D) and -0.67 D +/- 0.55 D (range 0 D to -2.50 D) respectively. No eye lost 2 or more lines of BCVA. The UCVA was > or = to 20/20 in 56% of the cases and 20/40 or better in 100% of the cases. No eye developed corneal haze that affected visual acuity. No major complications were recorded.LASEK treatment is a safe and effective technique for treatment of low to high myopia. This surgical technique is less invasive and more effective than LASIK because of the lack of flap- and microkeratome-related complications.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Treatment Outcome, Keratomileusis, Laser In Situ, Myopia, Visual Acuity, Humans, Prospective Studies, Middle Aged, Follow-Up Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    7
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
7
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!