
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) for the treatment of myopia and astigmatism (low, moderate and high).Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy was performed by 3 surgeons in 45 eyes using an INPRO Gauss Excimer laser (31 eyes) or a NIDEK EC-5000 Excimer Laser (14 eyes). The mean follow-up is 9 months (3-15 months). Preoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and corneal topography were measured. The postoperative parameters were: uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), spherical equivalent refraction (SER), defocus equivalent refraction (DER), and corneal topography.The mean preoperative sphere and cylinder were -4.09 diopters (D) +/- 1.94 D (range -1.25 D to -9.75 D) and -0.67 D +/- 0.55 D (range 0 D to -2.50 D) respectively. No eye lost 2 or more lines of BCVA. The UCVA was > or = to 20/20 in 56% of the cases and 20/40 or better in 100% of the cases. No eye developed corneal haze that affected visual acuity. No major complications were recorded.LASEK treatment is a safe and effective technique for treatment of low to high myopia. This surgical technique is less invasive and more effective than LASIK because of the lack of flap- and microkeratome-related complications.
Adult, Treatment Outcome, Keratomileusis, Laser In Situ, Myopia, Visual Acuity, Humans, Prospective Studies, Middle Aged, Follow-Up Studies
Adult, Treatment Outcome, Keratomileusis, Laser In Situ, Myopia, Visual Acuity, Humans, Prospective Studies, Middle Aged, Follow-Up Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 7 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
