Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Comparative study of CABG following PTCA and PTCA following CABG].

Authors: Y, Hirate; T, Abe; K, Yasuura; M, Tanaka; T, Kato; K, Iida; S, Tsuchiya;

[Comparative study of CABG following PTCA and PTCA following CABG].

Abstract

Forty-five cases of PTCA with prior CABG and 14 cases of CABG with prior PTCA were studied on their pathogenesis and results. Ninety-four PTCA procedures were performed electively after CABG on 45 patients and 145 lesions. Lesion success rates were 95.8% in stenosis and 55.6% in occluded vessel. The mortality was none and no emergent surgery was needed. Causes of PTCA following CABG included the progression of coronary artery disease (13.1%), graft stenosis (15.0%), graft occlusion (31.0%), incomplete revascularization (13.8%), restenosis after the initial procedure (26.2%). Especially percentage of the progression of coronary artery disease was increased with a lapse of time, and it was 31.7% in PTCA group over 3 years after CABG. Fourteen patients with prior PTCA were received CABG because of unsuccessful PTCA (50.0%), progression to LMCD (21.4%), restenosis (21.4%), and PTCA complication (7.1%). Both interventions were appropriate and useful to reduce the recurrent ischemia and cardiac events with each other. Myocardial revascularization should not be considered either PTCA or CABG, but PTCA and CABG. In conclusion the strategy that much more benefits can be obtained from supplementary use of PTCA and CABG makes it possible to reduce the mortality and morbidity associated with intervention.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Humans, Coronary Disease, Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary, Coronary Artery Bypass, Prognosis

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!