Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Immunodiagnosis of Taenia saginata cysticercosis].

Authors: S, Geerts; J, Brandt; V, Kumar; R, De Deken;

[Immunodiagnosis of Taenia saginata cysticercosis].

Abstract

Many different serological tests have been investigated in order to replace the current "knife and eye" method at the slaughterhouse, which detects only a small fraction of the cattle infected with cysticercosis. Among the assays for the detection of antibodies against the cysticerci of Taenia saginata, the ELISA is certainly the most sensitive, although it is unable to detect lightly infected animals. Consequently it only allows a group diagnosis in naturally infected cattle. The use of purified antigens of T. saginata, T. crassiceps and T. hydatigena did not improve significantly the reliability of these antibody detection tests. Recently monoclonal antibodies have been developed against surface or excretory- and secretory antigens of T. saginata metacestodes, allowing the detection of circulating antigens in the serum of infected cattle. Furthermore these monoclonal antibodies can distinguish animals carrying living, infectious cysticerci from those harbouring only dead cysticerci. Research is currently going on in order to improve the sensitivity of this antigen detection test, so that it can replace the current unreliable meat inspection methods in the slaughterhouse.

Keywords

Meat, Taenia, Cysticercosis, Antibodies, Helminth, Animals, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Cattle, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Food Inspection

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!