Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Hospitalization facilities required for quality care of lung cancer patients].

Authors: R M, Ferri-Dessens; P, Thomas; F, Barlesi; V, Raholimina; J P, Kleisbauer;

[Hospitalization facilities required for quality care of lung cancer patients].

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine whether good-quality care for patients with lung cancer can be delivered without a full hospitalization unit. Our study included all consecutive untreated lung cancer patients admitted over a two-year period. The following criteria were analyzed retrospectively: residence, age, sex, histology, staging, treatments, administrative data during the first 6 months of treatment, place of death, and duration of last stay before death in the unit. Two hundred six patients were recorded. Twenty-eight percent of the patients had stage IIIB disease and 61% stage IV disease. The first treatment included: surgery (12%), chemotherapy (80%). During the first six months, the median number of hospitalizations was 8 and the median number of full hospitalization days was 17 compared with 6 days for one-day stays. The median duration of the first stay was 5 days whereas the duration of the last one was 3 days. During the first year, 71% of the patients dies: 36% in our unit (47% of them were inpatients for more than 6 days during their last stay). Diagnosis, initial treatment, management of treatment complications and supportive care are not compatible with weekly hospitalization. Full hospitalization is mandatory for good-quality care in a referral cancer unit.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Patient Care Team, Health Services Needs and Demand, Lung Neoplasms, Palliative Care, Hospital Departments, Length of Stay, Middle Aged, Combined Modality Therapy, Home Care Services, Hospitalization, Oncology Service, Hospital, Humans, Female, France, Aged, Forecasting, Neoplasm Staging

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    3
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
3
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!