Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Medicinaarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Medicina
Article . 2003
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Radiofrequency fistulotomy in anal fistula. An alternative to conventional surgical fistulotomy.

Authors: Pravin J, Gupta;

Radiofrequency fistulotomy in anal fistula. An alternative to conventional surgical fistulotomy.

Abstract

Most surgeons prefer fistulotomy by laying an open technique in treating different types of anal fistula. We used the radiofrequency fistulotomy procedure in 136 cases of various types of low anal fistulae in a one-year period. The patients were followed for 18 months. The average time for complete wound healing was 37 days and to resume routine 7 days. Delayed wound healing occurred in 7 patients. It failed completely in 2 patients and 3 patients lost to follow up. No patient had interference with continence. Radiofrequency fistulotomy method was effective with easy tissue excision and minimum bleeding. It permitted to be used in deep and difficult areas like the adjoining tracts. The failure rate was 3.7%. (Ref. 5.)

Keywords

Wound Healing, Time Factors, Recurrence, Catheter Ablation, Humans, Rectal Fistula, Length of Stay, Follow-Up Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
gold