Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ The Angle Orthodonti...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Skeletal and dental contributions to posterior crossbites.

Authors: David, Allen; Joe, Rebellato; Rose, Sheats; Ana M, Ceron;

Skeletal and dental contributions to posterior crossbites.

Abstract

The objective of this retrospective study was to compare skeletal and dental arch morphology of children with posterior crossbites with a control group of children without posterior crossbites. The study included 93 patients with a posterior crossbite (33 boys and 60 girls) and 97 patients without a posterior crossbite (50 boys and 47 girls). Skeletal and dental characteristics between the two groups were compared using measurements of dental casts, and lateral and posteroanterior cephalograms. Univariate analyses revealed that seven characteristics were significantly different between the crossbite and non-crossbite groups: mandibular plane angle, lower face height, skeletal maxillary to mandibular width ratio, maxillary intermolar width, mandibular intermolar width, maxillary to mandibular intermolar width ratio, and mandibular unit length. Using maxillary to madibular intermolar width ratio as the outcome measure, a stepwise variable selection technique, analyzed all 190 patients and found only two variables significantly associated with this measure: skeletal maxillary to mandibular width ratio and lower face height. The coefficient of multiple determination for this model was only 13%, indicating that these two variables accounted for only a small portion in the variation of the ratio between the maxillary and mandibular intermolar widths.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Male, Analysis of Variance, Adolescent, Cephalometry, Vertical Dimension, Mandible, Molar, Facial Bones, Models, Dental, Dental Arch, Linear Models, Maxilla, Humans, Female, Child, Malocclusion, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    34
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
34
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
gold