Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Non-penetrating deep sclerectomy combined with phacoemulsification. Results and complications].

Authors: F J, Muñoz Negrete; G, Rebolleda; S, Noval;

[Non-penetrating deep sclerectomy combined with phacoemulsification. Results and complications].

Abstract

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of phaco-deep nonpenetrating sclerectomy (PDNS) with reticulated hyaluronic acid implant for glaucoma combined surgery.Noncomparative retrospective study of 39 eyes of 36 patients who underwent PDNS. Preoperative and 1, 7 days, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery data retrieved were best-corrected visual acuity, intraocular pressure (IOP), number of glaucoma medications and intra and postoperative complications.Mean preoperative IOP was 23.1 mm Hg (SD: 8.8). Statistically significant reduction in IOP was observed in all postoperative visits (P = 0.000); a mean IOP reduction of 8.63 mm Hg (SD: 8.55) and 6.88 mm Hg (SD: 5.46) was found 6 and 12 months after surgery respectively. Mean percentage of IOP reduction was 32.78% (SD: 21.30) and 27.74% (SD: 18.15) six and twelve months after surgery respectively. Mean preoperative number of glaucoma medications was 1.76 (SD: 0.85). In all postoperative visits a statistically significant reduction in the number of glaucoma medications was observed (P = 0.000). One year after PDNS, mean number of antiglaucoma drugs was 0.34 (SD: 0.60), and 71.9% of the eyes did not need any glaucoma medication. Predetermined target IOP was achieved in 84.2% of the eyes. A gain of almost 3 lines of mean VA was observed one year after surgery. Severe inflammatory reaction (7.7%) and hyphema (5.1%) were the most frequent observed complications.These preliminary results suggest that PDNS could be a safe and effective surgical technique for combining glaucoma and cataract surgery.

Keywords

Aged, 80 and over, Male, Phacoemulsification, Humans, Female, Glaucoma, Middle Aged, Sclera, Aged, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    6
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
6
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!