
US findings of 81 patients with breast cancer were analyzed respectively to evaluate the usefulness of US in the preoperative diagnosis of internal mammary mode metastases. The internal mammary area (I.M.A.) in which internal mammary nodes lie was shown as a hypoechoic stripe in a sagittal scan along the sternum and as a triangular or spindle-shaped hypoechoic area in a transverse scan in the intercostal space. The US features of each I.M.A. in the first three intercostal spaces were divided into three patterns: Pattern-A wad defined as widening of the ipsilateral side of the I.M.A. compared with the contralateral side; Pattern-C was defined as normal at both sides of the I.M.A. Pathological examination confirmed the node metastases in 85.7% of intercostal scans showing Pattern-A and in 35% of intercostal scans showing Pattern-B. Only one of 189 intercostal scans showing Pattern-C had nodal metastases. The overall accuracy was 88.1% in 243 intercostal scans and 90.1% in 81 patients. We conclude that US is useful in the detection of internal mammary node metastases in patients with breast cancer.
Breast Neoplasms, Sensitivity and Specificity, Predictive Value of Tests, Lymphatic Metastasis, Preoperative Care, Humans, Female, Breast, Lymph Nodes, Retrospective Studies, Ultrasonography
Breast Neoplasms, Sensitivity and Specificity, Predictive Value of Tests, Lymphatic Metastasis, Preoperative Care, Humans, Female, Breast, Lymph Nodes, Retrospective Studies, Ultrasonography
| citations The total number of citations received by all articles of the researcher of interest. | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
