
Dilation of the pupil is a procedure with both clinical and legal ramifications. Optometrists must be familiar with the requirements of informed consent, which must be met when utilizing dilation on the 4-8 percent of patients with anterior chamber angles that are narrow enough to cause an angle closure. Optometrists also must recognize those circumstances under which pupillary dilation is necessary, both for symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. The correct drug regimen must be selected, whether it is for "routine" pupillary dilation or for a patient with a condition requiring a special drug regimen. Patients with dilated pupils must be appropriately managed, and failure to warn a patient of common and expected side effects may create liability if the failure to warn is the cause of injury. If complications--such as acute angle closure--occur, the optometrist must be prepared to manage the situation so as to minimize the risk of injury to the patient.
Mydriatics, Informed Consent, Eye Diseases, Fundus Oculi, Malpractice, Humans, Pupil, Glaucoma, Angle-Closure, Optometry
Mydriatics, Informed Consent, Eye Diseases, Fundus Oculi, Malpractice, Humans, Pupil, Glaucoma, Angle-Closure, Optometry
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
