
Various methods are available today for the quantification of regurgitation by transthoracic Doppler. The present review deals with their respective usefulness in tricuspid insufficiency (TI). Despite their contribution in the domain of mitral and aortic insufficiency, precise quantification methods remain of very limited value regarding the tricuspid orifice, and this because of practical difficulties of application. Evaluations of the severity of TI is based, essentially, on a semiquantitative approach. Cartography of the regurgitation stream, by colour Doppler, is the chief method, despite its limitations which are clearly emphasised by the effects of the contrast test. The discovery, by pulsed Doppler, of laminar systolic flow is a sign of capital importance. It is indicative of massive TI and of particular anatomical and hemodynamic conditions, but it is uncommon. Systolic reversal of flow in the inferior vena cava is a good sign of severity but lacks specificity. In contrast, measurement of maximum velocities of TI, while essential for the evaluation of pulmonary pressures, is of no value in terms of the quantification of regurgitation. Transthoracic Doppler data must be taken together with those of transthoracic echocardiography, the esophageal approach offering nothing special, being essentially useful in lesion evaluation. The quantification of TI, by transthoracic Doppler, has derived only very little benefit from the current orientation of Doppler methods.
Animals, Humans, Tricuspid Valve, Echocardiography, Doppler, Tricuspid Valve Insufficiency
Animals, Humans, Tricuspid Valve, Echocardiography, Doppler, Tricuspid Valve Insufficiency
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
