Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Quantification by transthoracic Doppler of tricuspid valve insufficiencies].

Authors: O, Hadjian; B, Bertrand; P, Defaye; G, Vanzetto; M, Contard; B, Denis;

[Quantification by transthoracic Doppler of tricuspid valve insufficiencies].

Abstract

Various methods are available today for the quantification of regurgitation by transthoracic Doppler. The present review deals with their respective usefulness in tricuspid insufficiency (TI). Despite their contribution in the domain of mitral and aortic insufficiency, precise quantification methods remain of very limited value regarding the tricuspid orifice, and this because of practical difficulties of application. Evaluations of the severity of TI is based, essentially, on a semiquantitative approach. Cartography of the regurgitation stream, by colour Doppler, is the chief method, despite its limitations which are clearly emphasised by the effects of the contrast test. The discovery, by pulsed Doppler, of laminar systolic flow is a sign of capital importance. It is indicative of massive TI and of particular anatomical and hemodynamic conditions, but it is uncommon. Systolic reversal of flow in the inferior vena cava is a good sign of severity but lacks specificity. In contrast, measurement of maximum velocities of TI, while essential for the evaluation of pulmonary pressures, is of no value in terms of the quantification of regurgitation. Transthoracic Doppler data must be taken together with those of transthoracic echocardiography, the esophageal approach offering nothing special, being essentially useful in lesion evaluation. The quantification of TI, by transthoracic Doppler, has derived only very little benefit from the current orientation of Doppler methods.

Keywords

Animals, Humans, Tricuspid Valve, Echocardiography, Doppler, Tricuspid Valve Insufficiency

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!