Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Abdominal vascular trauma: a review of 106 injuries.

Authors: M R, Jackson; D W, Olson; W C, Beckett; S B, Olsen; F M, Robertson;

Abdominal vascular trauma: a review of 106 injuries.

Abstract

A retrospective analysis of acute abdominal vascular injuries was performed to review outcome variables and treatment principles. The authors review their most recent 5-year experience with 106 major abdominal vascular injuries in 64 patients treated at a combined Army and Air Force urban medical center. The majority of the patients were young men who sustained penetrating injuries. There were 41 (64%) gunshot wounds, 17 (27%) stab wounds, and 6 (9%) sustained blunt trauma. Forty-five patients (71%) came to the hospital in shock. The inferior vena cava in 26 patients (41%) and the aorta in 11 patients (17%) were injured most frequently. Suture repair was possible in 53 (50%) injuries. Ligation was performed in 41 (39%). Overall mortality for the series was 39 per cent. Hemorrhagic shock was the cause of death in 23 patients (92%) with only two late deaths. Transfusion requirement, presence of shock, and number of vessels injured all affected outcome. Immediate stabilization in the emergency department includes appropriate crystalloid and blood product resuscitation with minimal delay for diagnostic studies. Prompt abdominal exploration to control hemorrhage and particular attention to factors associated with coagulopathy remain the key elements in saving the lives of these severely injured patients.

Keywords

Adult, Male, Adolescent, Multiple Trauma, Vena Cava, Inferior, Abdominal Injuries, Arteries, Shock, Hemorrhagic, Veins, Survival Rate, Treatment Outcome, Cause of Death, Humans, Female, Aorta, Abdominal, Emergencies, Hypotension, Vascular Surgical Procedures, Aorta, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    50
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
50
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!