Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Recurrent bacterial vaginosis: association with vaginal sponge use.

Authors: M B, Mengel; A B, Davis;

Recurrent bacterial vaginosis: association with vaginal sponge use.

Abstract

A hypothesis-generation study was conducted to examine risk factors for bacterial vaginosis recurrences among women participating in a randomized controlled trial of male sexual partner treatment. Of the 140 women enrolled in the trial, 72 had a normal vaginal gram-stained slide at the first follow-up visit and were included in this analysis. Nineteen of the 72 (26.2%) women developed a bacterial vaginosis recurrence documented by a vaginal gram-stained slide during the 6-week follow-up period. Of the 19 women, 4 of 6 sponge users (66%) developed a bacterial vaginosis recurrence (RR 2.93, 95% CI: 1.43-6.02). Logistic regression analysis supported the association between sponge use and bacterial vaginosis recurrences (adjusted RR 2.71, 95% CI: 1.06-6.99) but revealed that an apparent protective effect of diaphragm use was due to the confounding effect of sexual partner treatment. Our hypothesis is that bacterial vaginosis recurrences may be due to factors other than sexual transmission, such as sponge use. Further studies are needed to examine risk factors for bacterial vaginosis recurrences. In the interim, physicians might suggest another form of contraception to their sponge-using patient with frequent bacterial vaginosis infections.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Adolescent, Contraceptive Devices, Female, Vaginosis, Bacterial, Logistic Models, Recurrence, Risk Factors, Animals, Humans, Female, Trichomonas Vaginitis, Candidiasis, Vulvovaginal

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!