
Seventy-four patients were operated at Bichat hospital for chronic ulnar nerve entrapment at the elbow between 1982 and 1988. For 62 of them, the etiology of the compression was idiopathic and these cases were treated by neurolysis only or, if the nerve was unstable, by neurolysis associated with medial epicondylectomy. For 12 of them, the etiology of the compression was post-traumatic and these cases were treated by anterior subcutaneous transposition of the nerve using a fat sling. The average follow-up is 28 months and the results take into account the clinical preoperative grading according Mac Gowan's classification: grade I subjective symptoms combined with hypoesthesia in ulnar fingers grade II: weakness and wasting of the interossei combined with subjective symptoms, grade III: marked weakness and wasting of the interossei, adductor pollicis, and hypothenar muscles combined with anesthesia in ulnar fingers. The 62 idiopathic compressions treated by neurolysis only or, if the nerve was unstable, by neurolysis associated with medial epicondylectomy showed 51 very good and good results. The 12 post-traumatic compressions treated by anterior subcutaneous transposition of the nerve using a fat sling showed 9 very good and good results. The authors stress the importance of their approach which takes account of the clinical preoperative grading and the etiology of the compression in order to apply correct surgical treatment.
Male, Time Factors, Electrodiagnosis, Nerve Compression Syndromes, Neural Conduction, Humerus, Middle Aged, Treatment Outcome, Elbow, Humans, Female, Ulnar Nerve
Male, Time Factors, Electrodiagnosis, Nerve Compression Syndromes, Neural Conduction, Humerus, Middle Aged, Treatment Outcome, Elbow, Humans, Female, Ulnar Nerve
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 7 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
