Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Low calcium (2.5 mEq/l) and high calcium (3.5 mEq/l) dialysate in peritoneal dialysis patients.

Authors: N K, Wadhwa; N, Howell; H, Suh; T, Cabralda;

Low calcium (2.5 mEq/l) and high calcium (3.5 mEq/l) dialysate in peritoneal dialysis patients.

Abstract

To compare the effects of low-calcium and high-calcium dialysate in stable ESRD patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD).Dialysate containing 2.5 mEq/l and 3.5 mEq/l calcium in combination with oral calcium salts as phosphate binders were evaluated.Tertiary-referral university hospital.Fifteen patients (6 male, 9 female) on low-calcium (2.5 mEq/l) and 15 patients (6 male, 9 female) on high-calcium (3.5 mEq/l) dialysate were studied for 6 months. All patients received calcium acetate or calcium carbonate to control hyperphosphatemia before the study.Serum calcium, phosphorus and albumin did not differ before and after between the two groups. Three patients in low-calcium and five in high-calcium group developed hypercalcemia. Three in low-calcium group and four in high-calcium group required sucralfate to control hyperphosphatemia and hypercalcemia. Mean dose of elemental calcium was 1152 mg/day in low-calcium group and 790 mg/day in high-calcium group. A negative correlation (r = -0.82, p < 0.005) was observed between serum calcium and PTH at the end of study period in the low-calcium group. No such relationship was observed in the high-calcium group.Degree and frequency of hypercalcemia appeared similar with low-calcium and high-calcium dialysate in peritoneal dialysis patients.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Male, Parathyroid Hormone, Dialysis Solutions, Humans, Kidney Failure, Chronic, Calcium, Female, Phosphorus, Middle Aged, Peritoneal Dialysis, Serum Albumin

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!