Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Transcervical fallopian tube recanalization: a safe and effective therapy for patients with proximal tubal obstruction.

Authors: K B, Isaacson; M, Amendola; M, Banner; M, Glassner; S J, Sondheimer;

Transcervical fallopian tube recanalization: a safe and effective therapy for patients with proximal tubal obstruction.

Abstract

Over a 13-month period, 14 patients with proximal tubal obstruction underwent transcervical fallopian tube recanalization under fluoroscopic guidance in an outpatient setting at the hospital of the University of Pennsylvania. Twenty-one of 24 attempted tubal dilations (87.5%) were successful, as demonstrated by tubal opacification and contrast spillage into the peritoneal cavity at the conclusion of the procedure. Four intrauterine pregnancies, and no ectopic pregnancies, have followed the recanalization. One pregnancy ended in an early miscarriage, one patient delivered a healthy term female, and two pregnancies are ongoing at greater than twenty weeks' gestation. Two procedure-related complications occurred: in one patient, the isthmic segment of a fallopian tube was perforated, but healed without incident, and another patient experienced a low-grade fever, which resolved with p.o. antibiotics. We therefore conclude that fallopian tube recanalization is a well-tolerated, safe, and effective procedure for the treatment of proximal tubal occlusion.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Cervix Uteri, Fallopian Tube Diseases, Middle Aged, Dilatation, Hysterosalpingography, Catheterization, Postoperative Complications, Pregnancy, Humans, Female, Infertility, Female, Fallopian Tubes

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    6
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
6
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!