Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Computed tomography of retroperitoneal neoplasms].

Authors: J R, Dai;

[Computed tomography of retroperitoneal neoplasms].

Abstract

CT findings of retroperitoneal neoplasma in 50 cases (51 tumors) were reviewed. There were 28 (55%) malignant tumors and 23 (45%) benign ones. MFH and liposarcoma were the most common malignant tumors and neural origin tumors were the most common benign ones. Differentiation is difficult on the basis of CT features alone. Benign tumors were usually smooth and well defined, and malignant ones ill-defined, irregular in shape, heterogenous in density with massive necrosis. The characteristic CT appearance of liposarcoma is the CT attenuation value by fat density. Neural origin tumors are usually located near the spine. They may have thick wall cystic appearance or are dumbbell shaped, showing expansion or extrinsic pressure to the adjacent bone structures. MFH, hemangiopericytoma and other malignant tumors may have marked enhancement after contrast administration. Non-resectability is shown as: 1. big vessels encased by tumor over 90 degrees, 2. adjacent organs or structures invaded by tumor, 3. multiple masses, and 4. huge tumor invading into the pelvis. Local recurrence is common after surgery. Follow-up CT scans every 6 months in a 2 year period is suggested for early detection of recurrence.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Male, Histiocytoma, Benign Fibrous, Liposarcoma, Middle Aged, Humans, Lipomatosis, Female, Retroperitoneal Neoplasms, Diagnostic Errors, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Neurilemmoma, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!