
To verify the effect of surface penetrating sealant on the roughness of posterior resin-based composites before and after mechanical toothbrushing.10 specimens of four different composites (Alert, Definite, Z100 and Prodigy Condensable) were made using a metal matrix (height 2 mm and diameter 4 mm). After 24 hours, the specimens were polished using Sof-Lex discs in sequence: coarse, medium, fine and superfine, each for 40 seconds and, immediately, one of the surfaces was covered with Protect-It surface sealant. All the specimens were examined with a profilometer to measure the initial surface roughness before mechanical toothbrushing at a constant speed of 250 strokes/minute with a total of 30,000 cycles, using a toothbrush and dentifrice containing calcium carbonate as abrasive, under a load of 200 g. After toothbrushing the surface roughness was measured once again. The data were analyzed with ANOVA and the Tukey test at a 95% confidence level.Mechanical toothbrushing increased the surface roughness of all the composites studied (Alert: 0.7303 +/- 0.0942 microm; Definite: 0.4961 +/- 0.1255 microm; Z100: 0.3428 +/- 0.0841 microm), with the exception of Prodigy Condensable (0.2782 +/- 0.0678 microm) (P > 0.05). The surface penetrating sealant effectively decreased the surface roughness for Alert (0.5435 +/- 0.2182 microm) and Definite (0.2956 +/- 0.0368 microm) (P 0.05).
Toothbrushing, Analysis of Variance, Time Factors, Siloxanes, Surface Properties, Terpenes, Silicon Dioxide, Composite Resins, Calcium Carbonate, Dental Polishing, Materials Testing, Confidence Intervals, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Humans, Methacrylates, Zirconium, Dentifrices
Toothbrushing, Analysis of Variance, Time Factors, Siloxanes, Surface Properties, Terpenes, Silicon Dioxide, Composite Resins, Calcium Carbonate, Dental Polishing, Materials Testing, Confidence Intervals, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Humans, Methacrylates, Zirconium, Dentifrices
| citations The total number of citations received by all articles of the researcher of interest. | 34 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
