Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Stability of surgical maxillary expansion.

Authors: C, Phillips; W H, Medland; H W, Fields; W R, Proffit; R P, White;

Stability of surgical maxillary expansion.

Abstract

Stability after transverse expansion of the maxilla via Le Fort I osteotomy with segments was evaluated in 39 patients. The average expansion was 5.4 mm at the second molars, decreasing almost linearly to 2.8 mm at the first premolars. Postsurgical relapse also was greatest at the second molars, averaging 2.6 mm. The percentage of relapse was greatest posteriorly, decreasing from 49% at the second molars to 30% at the first premolars. Considerable variability in stability followed surgery: Three-fourths of the patients had some relapse at the first molars (greater than 3 mm in 28%), but one fourth were stable. Sixty-two percent of the patients had a net posttreatment gain in arch width at the first molars. No correlation was found between transverse relapse and the type of presurgical orthodontic tooth movement, the use of rigid fixation, or the use of an auxiliary stabilizing arch wire. The amount of postsurgical relapse was significantly greater in those who had concurrent mandibular surgery. To improve clinical results with surgical expansion, we recommend (1) moderate overexpansion at surgery for major transverse changes, (2) maintenance of the occlusal splint for at least 6 weeks, and (3) use of a lingual arch wire or auxiliary labial arch wire to maintain molar width during postsurgical orthodontics.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Male, Postoperative Care, Palatal Expansion Technique, Occlusal Splints, Osteotomy, Treatment Outcome, Recurrence, Orthodontic Appliances, Removable, Maxilla, Orthodontic Wires, Humans, Female, Malocclusion

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    72
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
72
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!