Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Classification of acute respiratory disorders of all newborns in a tertiary care center.

Authors: Vish, Agrawal; Richard J, David; Vivian J, Harris;

Classification of acute respiratory disorders of all newborns in a tertiary care center.

Abstract

To assess the usefulness of current diagnostic criteria in the understanding of neonatal respiratory distress in a tertiary care hospital.We prospectively studied 2824 consecutive deliveries to determine the frequency of respiratory disorders of all types. We used definitions based on standard texts, with borderline cases being classified as having the disease in question.Somewhat less than half of all symptomatic infants met textbook criteria for a respiratory diagnosis. Of this subset, the most common diagnosis was respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), followed by transient tachypnea of newborn (TTN), meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS), pneumonia and others. The 323 infants who fit no standard diagnosis all had self-limited conditions similar to TTN. Most (52%) were well in less than 12 hours. Those still symptomatic after 12 hours differed from the definition of TTN by having a clear chest film (38%) and/or by requiring mechanical ventilation (10%). A slight revision of the traditional diagnostic criteria allowed classification of all these cases.More than 50% of newborns with acute respiratory symptoms do not fit textbook definitions, even broad definitions which include borderline cases. The concept of TTN should be expanded to include cases with a normal chest film. In addition, we suggest adding the category "transient respiratory insufficiency of the newbom" (TRIN) for babies ventilated briefly but not demonstrably surfactant deficient or infected. This category probably includes infants with many contributing etiologies.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Diagnosis, Differential, Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn, Respiration, Respiratory Tract Diseases, Infant, Newborn, Humans, Prospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    19
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
19
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!