Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[The piggyback technique in venous outflow tract reconstruction in liver transplantation].

Authors: P, Nĕmec; J, Ondrásek; J, Nicovský; P, Studeník; J, Hökl; R, Wagner; M, Simková; +1 Authors

[The piggyback technique in venous outflow tract reconstruction in liver transplantation].

Abstract

Nowadays, the piggyback technique of venous outflow tract reconstruction has been adopted by an increasing number of transplant teams. From January 1996 to August 2000, we used it in 73 of 84 liver transplantations (86.9%) in our institution. We observed one postoperative complication (1.4%) in direct relation to this technique. The main advantages of the piggyback are 1. maintaining of the haemodynamic stability during the anhepatic phase, 2. avoiding of the veno-venous bypass, 3. diminution of blood loss, 4. easier solution of the graft size mismatch problem, 5. shorter manipulation time and 6. easier retransplantation. Disadvantages of the piggyback technique include 1. more technically demanding recipient's hepatectomy, 2. the potential for venous outflow tract obstruction and 3. possible thrombosis in a blind caval pouch. According to our results and experience in the literature, we consider the piggyback technique as a method of choice for venous outflow tract reconstruction in liver transplantation. It can be used in the majority of patients after gaining some experience.

Keywords

Anastomosis, Surgical, Humans, Vena Cava, Inferior, Hepatic Veins, Liver Transplantation

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!