
This article describes the development of an instrument to audit the nurse-patient relationship based on the nursing philosophy of a Swiss hospital, which describes the nurse-patient relationship using terms such as mutual respect, support, accompaniment and information. Members of the nursing department developed quality criteria for the nurse-patient relationship employing the Nominal Group Technique. The criteria were validated through a review of the relevant literature. In a next step the criteria were operationalized into a normative instrument for evaluating the nurse-patient relationship. Using this instrument data was gathered in five wards both by interviewing patients and nurses and by analysing nursing documents. Data analyses revealed different levels in the quality indicators in the various wards. These differences can be explained on one hand by differences in the quality of the nurse-patient relationship on these wards and on the other hand by errors in the instrument. Suggestions on how to raise validity and reliability of the instrument are stated.
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Quality Assurance, Health Care, Data Collection, Nursing Audit, Reproducibility of Results, Middle Aged, Patient Satisfaction, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Humans, Female, Philosophy, Nursing, Nurse-Patient Relations, Switzerland, Aged
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Quality Assurance, Health Care, Data Collection, Nursing Audit, Reproducibility of Results, Middle Aged, Patient Satisfaction, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Humans, Female, Philosophy, Nursing, Nurse-Patient Relations, Switzerland, Aged
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
