
Bronchoscopic examination is an established method, most often performed by lung doctors, yet still mandatory in the training of specialists in otolaryngology. Little has so far been published on the safety and diagnostic and therapeutic value of this procedure in our country.Specialists or residents in otolaryngology performed 140 flexible bronchoscopies in 132 consecutive patients during 1993-2000. Local anaesthesia was used in 132 and general anaesthesia in 8. There were 59 outpatient and 81 inpatient procedures. The medical records were examined retrospectively.The indication for bronchoscopy was suspected cancer in 98 cases. At the time of the examination 78 patients had intrathoracic malignant disease. Diagnostic sensitivity in bronchogenic cancer (n = 65) was 71%. Diagnostic sensitivity when tumour was endoscopically visible (n = 41) and non-visible (n = 37) was 85 % and 49% respectively. No cancer was found in patients with haemoptysis as the only symptom (n = 11). No serious complications occurred.Bronchoscopy, including examination for malignant disease was performed safely and with good results. The number of bronchoscopic examinations on non-cancer or classical otolaryngologic patients would probably be too low to maintain the skills and secure good education in our department.
Adult, Male, Hemoptysis, Lung Neoplasms, Adolescent, Norway, Middle Aged, Bronchoscopes, Bronchoscopy, Humans, Female, Clinical Competence, Aged
Adult, Male, Hemoptysis, Lung Neoplasms, Adolescent, Norway, Middle Aged, Bronchoscopes, Bronchoscopy, Humans, Female, Clinical Competence, Aged
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
