Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Comparative studies with three different bovine blood sample BHV-1 ELISA tests: indirect ELISA and bG-blocking-ELISA].

Authors: Gisela, Isa; Christian, Schelp; Uwe, Truyen;

[Comparative studies with three different bovine blood sample BHV-1 ELISA tests: indirect ELISA and bG-blocking-ELISA].

Abstract

A total of 2754 bovine blood samples were examined for BHV1 antibodies in three different BHV-1 ELISA tests. The tests used were the CHEKIT Trachitest 2nd. Gen. "Bestätigungstest" Serum, the CHEKIT-BHV-1-gB-ELISA (Bommeli-Diagnostics/Intervet), and the BHV-1-gB Antibody Test Kit (IDEXX). A first testing identified 111 (4.0%) of the samples as positive and 2501 (90.8%) samples negative in all three tests. Onehundredand-fortytwo (5.2%) of the samples showed a not negative result in at least one of the two gB-ELISAs. The testing was repeated for 139 of the 142 samples and still 89 (3.2%) samples were found with discrepant results. The remaining 50 samples showed a negative reaction in the three ELISA tests. After Western blot analysis antibodies against glycoprotein B (gB) of BHV-1 were only detected in 11 of the 89 samples with a not negative reaction in at least one of the gB-ELISAs. Three of the 50 ELISA-negative samples showed a positive reaction in the Western blot. The high number of positive results in the gB-ELISAs which were negative in the Western blot assay leads to the conclusion that gB-ELISAs may have a lower specificity as the indirect ELISA. Introducing the gB-ELISA as the standard test for BHV1 serology in Bavaria would result to an increase of the number of BHV-1 positive farms by 8% (gB IDEXX) or 20% (gB Bommeli) 20%.

Keywords

Viral Proteins, Viral Envelope Proteins, Animals, Cattle Diseases, Cattle, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Herpesviridae Infections, Antigens, Viral, Herpesvirus 1, Bovine

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    8
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
8
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!