Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Stereotactic large core needle biopsy for the diagnosis of nonpalpable breast lesions: reliable without additional excision biopsy].

Authors: L E, Hoorntje; P H M, Peeters; W P Th M, Mali; I H M, Borel Rinkes;

[Stereotactic large core needle biopsy for the diagnosis of nonpalpable breast lesions: reliable without additional excision biopsy].

Abstract

To determine the reliability of stereotactic large core needle biopsy (SLCNB) in the diagnostic work-up of suspected carcinomatous non-palpable breast lesions.Prospective.Between 1 February 2000 and 6 June 2002, data were collected on all patients with a non-palpable breast lesion who were scheduled to undergo a SLCNB. SLCNB procedures were performed in 4 centres and patients were referred from 40 hospitals in the Netherlands. Histological diagnosis at SLCNB and subsequent therapy were recorded. Results were compared with results of the preceding 'Core biopsy after radiological localisation' (COBRA) study, where each large core needle biopsy was followed by an excision biopsy. Follow-up data were also obtained from the Dutch National Automated Pathology Archive (PALGA). The adherence to the COBRA guidelines was also evaluated.Nine hundred and fifty-five patients were included with 995 lesions, and 905 biopsy procedures were completed in 874 patients (mean age: 59 years; range: 23-86). Of the high-risk lesions, 27% were found to be carcinomas upon excision biopsy, which is comparable to the results of the COBRA study (23%). Twenty-eight percent of the ductal in-situ carcinomas were found to be invasive, which is higher than in the COBRA study (17%). No malignancies were found during the limited follow-up period (mean: 20.0 months; range: 5.8-34.0). Ninenty-six percent of the patients were treated according to the COBRA guidelines.No malignancies were missed during the limited follow-up period, and therefore, to date, the sensitivity of SLCNB seems to be comparable to that estimated in the study setting.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Histocytochemistry, Biopsy, Needle, Breast Neoplasms, Middle Aged, Sensitivity and Specificity, Stereotaxic Techniques, Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating, Humans, Female, Neoplasm Invasiveness, Prospective Studies, Aged, Follow-Up Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    4
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
4
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!