
Investigation of hearing with whispered and colloquial speech and also tuning fork tests are used routinely by many otologists. A different group of otologists find the tests inconsistent and unreliable. This controversy has probably developed because the audiometer has replaced the tuning fork in hearing measurement. The hearing tests with the whispered and colloquial speech are also a little unsafe. However, they are important orientating hearing tests checking the result of audiometry. Some principles of the investigation of hearing with whispered and colloquial speech and the Weber- and Rinne-tuning fork test are shortly described. The necessary control of pure tone audiometry by tuning forks is pointed out. The value particularly in the diagnosis of conductive hearing loss, and the limitations of informal hearing tests and tuning forks are discussed.
Speech Reception Threshold Test, Predictive Value of Tests, Hearing Tests, Audiometry, Pure-Tone, Humans, Auditory Threshold, Hearing Disorders
Speech Reception Threshold Test, Predictive Value of Tests, Hearing Tests, Audiometry, Pure-Tone, Humans, Auditory Threshold, Hearing Disorders
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
