Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Preventive care in managed care and fee-for-service plans: is it cost effective?

Authors: Y Richard, Wang; Mark V, Pauly;

Preventive care in managed care and fee-for-service plans: is it cost effective?

Abstract

Lack of coverage, knowledge, and physician guidance, and low socioeconomic status are major barriers to receiving preventive care. Compared with fee-for-service insurance, managed care promotes prevention through more generous coverage, physician incentives, and patient education, and members of MCOs use more preventive services than do members of fee-for-service plans. However, cost effectiveness of prevention has not been previously examined. A study of seven preventive services suggests that managed care enrollees more frequently obtained four preventive services, including two less-effective ones. For less-effective services, it may be prudent to base disease-risk assessment on key factors other than age and sex, and screen only patients at high risk. Effective screening strategies must be identified, especially for the underserved, low-income population.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Male, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Managed Care Programs, Fee-for-Service Plans, Health Promotion, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Insurance Selection Bias, Risk Assessment, United States, Preventive Health Services, Humans, Mass Screening, Female, Health Services Research, Physical Examination, Poverty

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!