Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Psychiatria Polskaarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
addClaim

[Comparison between a SCAN diagnosis and a clinical diagnosis].

Authors: Krzysztof, Małyszczak; Joanna, Rymaszewska; Tomasz, Hadryś; Tomasz, Adamowski; Andrzej, Kiejna;

[Comparison between a SCAN diagnosis and a clinical diagnosis].

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to present comparison of clinical diagnoses and SCAN (Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry, version 2.1) diagnoses of patients treated in day care and inpatients wards. SCAN was translated at Medical University of Wrocław according to WHO permission. It is a part of multicenter study evaluating effectiveness of treatment in conventional psychiatric hospital and day hospital for acute psychiatric patients. Clinical diagnoses were made using ICD-10 classification system. Till now 56 patients were examined, 15 men and 39 women in age from 21 to 65 years old, median age 45 years old. Among them 31 patients were treated in day care wards, and 25 patients were treated in inpatients wards. During standard medical procedure diagnoses of 25 patients were classified into the block F2, and 19 patients into the block F3 of ICD-10 classification. Schizophrenia were diagnosed in 16 patients of, 19 patients had diagnosis of depressive disorder, and 21--of other mental disorders. Clinical diagnoses were in most of the cases single one; there were only 6 cases with double (comorbid) diagnoses. SCAN diagnoses were multiple, ranged from 1 to 12 (median 3) for one patient. Many concomitant SCAN diagnoses referred to tobacco use, sleep disorders, and somatoform disorders. Cohen's kappa coefficient for the block F2 was 0.78, for schizophrenia--0.62, for the block F3--0.42, and for depression--0.36. Results showed low agreement between clinical and SCAN diagnoses, particularly for mood disorders. The explanations of such discrepancies could be: no strict compliance with rules of ICD-10 by clinicians and avoidance of comorbid diagnoses by clinicians or errors in the SCAN coding algorithms. Further analyses are needed to characterize more precisely the sources of discrepancies.

Keywords

Adult, Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Depressive Disorder, Inpatients, Bipolar Disorder, Psychometrics, Mental Disorders, Reproducibility of Results, Middle Aged, Sensitivity and Specificity, Psychotic Disorders, Schizophrenia, Humans, Female, Schizophrenic Psychology, Poland, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
gold