
pmid: 12608672
handle: 11564/261806
Current literature has revealed that surface etching of endosseous implants can improve bone-implant contact. The aim of this study was to evaluate the differences in bone-implant contact (BIC) between sandblasted/acid-etched and machined-surface implants.Thirty-two Sprague-Dawley rats were used in this study. Two implant surfaces, Ecotek (sandblasted/ acid-etched) and machined, were used with 1 implant placed in each tibia of the animals. A total of 64 implants were placed. BIC was evaluated at 5, 15, 30, and 60 days. Histomorphometry of the BIC was evaluated statistically.The sandblasted/acid-etched surface demonstrated a greater BIC percentage than the machined surface. This difference was statistically significant only at 30 and 60 days after healing.The sandblasted/acid-etched surface demonstrated a stronger bone response than the machined one at a later period of healing.
Dental Implants, Male, Analysis of Variance, Time Factors, Tibia, Surface Properties, Statistics as Topic, Silicon Dioxide, Nitric Acid, Hydrofluoric Acid, Rats, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Dental Materials, Acid Etching, Dental, Dental Prosthesis Design, Osseointegration, Aluminum Oxide, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Animals, Particle Size
Dental Implants, Male, Analysis of Variance, Time Factors, Tibia, Surface Properties, Statistics as Topic, Silicon Dioxide, Nitric Acid, Hydrofluoric Acid, Rats, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Dental Materials, Acid Etching, Dental, Dental Prosthesis Design, Osseointegration, Aluminum Oxide, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Animals, Particle Size
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 19 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
