[Clinical and experimental study on separately decocted and mingly decocted jianweishu granule].
Copyright policy )[Clinical and experimental study on separately decocted and mingly decocted jianweishu granule].
To observe the difference in therapeutic effect of Chinese herbal granule decocted separately and mingly.One hundred patients of functional dyspepsia of Spleen deficiency and Liver stagnancy type were treated with Jianweishu Granule (JWSG, a self-formulated recipe by the author). Half of the patients received JWSG decocted separately, half of them received that decocted mingly. The therapeutic effects between the two groups were compared. Experimental observation on the effects of differently decocted remedies in rats was also conducted.The therapeutic effects obtained in the two groups were similar, with respective cure rate of 72% and 70% and the total effective rate 96% in both group. There was insignificant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). Experimental study all showed no difference between the differently decocted remedies in inhibiting gastric acid, pepsin activity, gastric function regulation, small intestine movement improvement and pain alleviation in rats.The therapeutic effects of JWSG decocted separately or mingly are the same. This fact provides a scientific basis for clinical use of granule form of single Chinese herbs.
Adult, Male, Middle Aged, Rats, Diagnosis, Differential, Drug Combinations, Mice, Random Allocation, Yang Deficiency, Animals, Humans, Drug Interactions, Female, Stomach Ulcer, Dyspepsia, Medicine, Chinese Traditional, Rats, Wistar, Drugs, Chinese Herbal, Phytotherapy
Adult, Male, Middle Aged, Rats, Diagnosis, Differential, Drug Combinations, Mice, Random Allocation, Yang Deficiency, Animals, Humans, Drug Interactions, Female, Stomach Ulcer, Dyspepsia, Medicine, Chinese Traditional, Rats, Wistar, Drugs, Chinese Herbal, Phytotherapy
selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources.This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).0 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average
Citations provided by BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!