Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Contrast sensitivity function in myopic LASIK].

Authors: Zonghui, Yan; Jianrong, Hu; Xunqing, Gu; Mian, Sun; Liqiong, Yang;

[Contrast sensitivity function in myopic LASIK].

Abstract

To evaluate near contrast sensitivity function before and after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK).With FACT 101 test chart, static near contrast sensitivity was measured in randomly selected 47 subjects (93 eyes) before, 1 month and 6 months after LASIK. The contrast sensitivity was measured at 1.5, 3.0, 6.0, 12.0 and 18.0 cycles per degree (c/d) spatial frequency respectively and made comparison in them.The patients achieved the mean uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) of 1.07 +/- 0.18 and 1.12 +/- 0.20 at postoperative 1-month and 6-months respectively. There was a general reduction in near contrast sensitivity in all spatial frequencies at postoperative 1-month when they were compared with the preoperative contrast sensitivity. The difference at 12 and 18 c/d spatial frequency was statistically significant (t test, P or = -6.00 D) and group with complaining of glare and halos after the surgery had a higher decrease rate of contrast sensitivity compared with that of the group preoperative < - 6.00 D and the group of patients without such complaints respectively. The differences at 6.0, 12.0 and 18.0 c/d spatial frequency at 1-month visit was statistically significant (t test, P < 0.05).The contrast sensitivity function test offers a more sensitive and comprehensive measure of functional vision than does standard Snellen acuity. The near contrast sensitivity in post-LASIK patients at early stage is reduced despite normal visual acuity and this can affect the quality of vision.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Male, Time Factors, Adolescent, Keratomileusis, Laser In Situ, Visual Acuity, Contrast Sensitivity, Random Allocation, Treatment Outcome, Myopia, Humans, Female

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!