Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Coverage of carious roots by a subepithelial connective tissue graft.

Authors: Moshe, Goldstein; Erez, Nasatzky; Joshef, Goultschin; Barbara, Boyan; Zvi, Schwartz;

Coverage of carious roots by a subepithelial connective tissue graft.

Abstract

To assess whether coverage of an untreated or restored carious root lesion with a subepithelial connective tissue graft would provide a predictable, esthetically acceptable result and prevent further caries progression.Twenty-seven teeth from 13 patients with root caries and gingival recessions of 3.4 +/- 0.2 mm (mean +/- SEM) were treated with subepithelial connective tissue grafts. Eighteen teeth had untreated caries, and the other nine had composite or glass-ionomer restorations. The carious dentin and the plastic restorations were removed prior to the surgical procedure. The exposed roots were thoroughly planed and covered by a subepithelial connective graft with no further root treatment or conditioning. The teeth were examined periodically from 1-6 years post-treatment for retention of root surface coverage and presence of carious lesions.The mean root coverage recession left after the treatment was 0.3 +/- 0.1 mm, with coverage of 92.4 +/- 2.4%. Significant differences (P< 0.05) were found between the coverage of roots with carious lesions that had not been restored and those that had restorations removed. However, since the number of teeth with restorations was limited, further study is required to confirm this difference. In 18 cases, complete coverage of the recession was achieved. The results were stable, and no further recessions or recurrent caries were detected.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Analysis of Variance, Statistics as Topic, Gingiva, Esthetics, Dental, Middle Aged, Composite Resins, Root Planing, Treatment Outcome, Connective Tissue, Glass Ionomer Cements, Recurrence, Root Caries, Dentin, Disease Progression, Humans, Female, Gingival Recession, Dental Restoration, Permanent, Follow-Up Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    5
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
5
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!