
To compare the visual outcomes and incidence of complications of lifting with recutting the lamellar flap in laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) enhancement surgery.Retrospective case-control study.Two hundred twelve consecutive eyes undergoing a LASIK enhancement procedure at a single surgery location during a 5-year period.Charts of participants were obtained and outcome measures obtained.Uncorrected visual acuity, best-corrected visual acuity, refractive error, complications.Relifting of flaps was performed in 164 of 212 eyes (77.4%), and recutting of flaps was performed in 48 of 212 eyes (22.6%). There were no significant differences in early visual outcomes between the two groups. At 1 year patients had significantly better uncorrected vision if the flap was lifted rather than recut (20/24.7 vs. 20/31.3, P < 0.008). In addition, the flap lift group had a significantly more stable refraction at 1 year than did the recut group (change in spherical equivalent: +0.05 diopters (D) vs. -0.57 D). The incidence of complications did not significantly differ between the two groups.LASIK enhancement surgery can be performed safely and effectively by either lifting or recutting a flap. Lifting the flap may show better long-term stability of refractive error and uncorrected acuity.
Adult, Male, Reoperation, Corneal Stroma, Incidence, Keratomileusis, Laser In Situ, Visual Acuity, Middle Aged, Surgical Flaps, Postoperative Complications, Treatment Outcome, Case-Control Studies, Myopia, Humans, Female, Intraoperative Complications, Retrospective Studies
Adult, Male, Reoperation, Corneal Stroma, Incidence, Keratomileusis, Laser In Situ, Visual Acuity, Middle Aged, Surgical Flaps, Postoperative Complications, Treatment Outcome, Case-Control Studies, Myopia, Humans, Female, Intraoperative Complications, Retrospective Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 56 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
