
pmid: 12401051
handle: 2158/311527
The aim of this study was to evaluate the degree of abrasion in posterior teeth of subjects with unilateral posterior crossbite in the deciduous dentition. A group of 54 untreated subjects in deciduous dentition (test group, TG) was selected from a parent sample of 1500 patients from the files of the Department of Orthodontics of the University of Florence. A sample of 20 subjects with normal occlusion in the deciduous dentition was selected as the control group (CG). As experimental units in TG, 54 crossbite sides (CB, consisting of 33 right and 21 left crossbite sides) and 54 noncrossbite sides (NCB) were used. In CG, one randomly chosen single side for each subject (NCBC) was used for comparisons. The findings of the present study indicated that subjects with unilateral crossbite in the deciduous dentition showed a significantly smaller degree of dental abrasion in the crossbite side when compared with both the opposite side and control group sides. The lack of abrasion in crossbite sides was primarily due to a significantly lesser degree of abrasion of the upper deciduous canines.
Male, Cuspid, Chi-Square Distribution, Dental attrition; Malocclusion; Occlusal wear; Primary dentition, Statistics as Topic, Reproducibility of Results, Mandible, Molar, Dental Occlusion, Tooth Abrasion, Case-Control Studies, Child, Preschool, Maxilla, Humans, Female, Tooth, Deciduous, Malocclusion
Male, Cuspid, Chi-Square Distribution, Dental attrition; Malocclusion; Occlusal wear; Primary dentition, Statistics as Topic, Reproducibility of Results, Mandible, Molar, Dental Occlusion, Tooth Abrasion, Case-Control Studies, Child, Preschool, Maxilla, Humans, Female, Tooth, Deciduous, Malocclusion
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 7 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
