
The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of 0.75% metronidazole vaginal gel with no treatment in patients who have had a minimally abnormal Papanicolaou smear.One hundred forty-five patients whose initial Papanicolaou smears were limited by inflammation or benign cellular changes, reactive cellular changes, or atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance that did not favor a neoplastic process were randomized to 5 days of treatment with 0.75% metronidazole vaginal gel or to a control group receiving no treatment. Papanicolaou smears were repeated after 3 to 4 months.Cytologic findings of the follow-up Papanicolaou smears were normal in 61 of 114 (54%) of patients. Sixty-two percent (n = 37) of the Papanicolaou smears in the control group converted to normal on follow-up, whereas 44% (n = 24) of the Papanicolaou smears in the treatment group converted to normal (P = .07). Only one follow-up Papanicolaou smear worsened to low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. In no subgroup was treatment effective.Empiric treatment for an asymptomatic, minimally abnormal Papanicolaou smear with 0.75% metronidazole vaginal gel before a repeated cytologic examination did not improve the rate of reversion to normal cytologic findings.
Adult, Vaginal Smears, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Cervix Uteri, Empirical Research, Treatment Outcome, Anti-Infective Agents, Metronidazole, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, Humans, Female, Papanicolaou Test
Adult, Vaginal Smears, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Cervix Uteri, Empirical Research, Treatment Outcome, Anti-Infective Agents, Metronidazole, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, Humans, Female, Papanicolaou Test
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
