Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Empiric treatment of minimally abnormal papanicolaou smears with 0.75% metronidazole vaginal gel.

Authors: Jeanne M, Ferrante; Dionne Y, Mayhew; Seth, Goldberg; Laurie, Woodard; Cynthia, Selleck; Richard G, Roetzheim;

Empiric treatment of minimally abnormal papanicolaou smears with 0.75% metronidazole vaginal gel.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of 0.75% metronidazole vaginal gel with no treatment in patients who have had a minimally abnormal Papanicolaou smear.One hundred forty-five patients whose initial Papanicolaou smears were limited by inflammation or benign cellular changes, reactive cellular changes, or atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance that did not favor a neoplastic process were randomized to 5 days of treatment with 0.75% metronidazole vaginal gel or to a control group receiving no treatment. Papanicolaou smears were repeated after 3 to 4 months.Cytologic findings of the follow-up Papanicolaou smears were normal in 61 of 114 (54%) of patients. Sixty-two percent (n = 37) of the Papanicolaou smears in the control group converted to normal on follow-up, whereas 44% (n = 24) of the Papanicolaou smears in the treatment group converted to normal (P = .07). Only one follow-up Papanicolaou smear worsened to low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. In no subgroup was treatment effective.Empiric treatment for an asymptomatic, minimally abnormal Papanicolaou smear with 0.75% metronidazole vaginal gel before a repeated cytologic examination did not improve the rate of reversion to normal cytologic findings.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Vaginal Smears, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Cervix Uteri, Empirical Research, Treatment Outcome, Anti-Infective Agents, Metronidazole, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, Humans, Female, Papanicolaou Test

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!