
This article describes the development of a 6-item instrument that measures thirst distress. Items were developed following open-ended interviews with 10 subjects, a literature review, and development of a conceptual definition of thirst. A panel of experts established content validity. A convenience sample (N = 247) of adults receiving outpatient hemodialysis completed the scale. A panel of experts was used to assess content validity. Item analysis was used to select unrelated or redundant items for deletion. Cronbach's alpha was .78. Construct validity was supported by confirmatory and exploratory factor analysis. Positive relationships between thirst distress and, respectively, thirst intensity and interdialytic weight gain provided additional evidence of construct validity. Overall, these preliminary data indicate that the thirst distress scale has sufficient reliability and validity for use in clinical studies.
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Renal Dialysis, Drinking, Humans, Reproducibility of Results, Middle Aged, Severity of Illness Index, Thirst, Aged
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Renal Dialysis, Drinking, Humans, Reproducibility of Results, Middle Aged, Severity of Illness Index, Thirst, Aged
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 25 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
