Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Direct stent implantation: feasibility, advantages and disadvantages].

Authors: Ertan, Okmen; Neşe, Cam;

[Direct stent implantation: feasibility, advantages and disadvantages].

Abstract

Coronary stent implantation was firstly performed as only a bail-out procedure for poor angioplasty results, but nowadays it has become a primary modality of coronary revascularization. The deployment of intracoronary stents during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty has been shown in a number of clinical trials to provide additional benefits regarding the rate of restenosis and clinical outcome over angioplasty alone. Direct stent implantation is the term applied to the technique of coronary stent implantation without firstly preparing the way with balloon predilation. In simple lesion subsets, both initial success rate and restenosis rate are superior to conventional balloon angioplasty. There is a considerable potential advantage of direct stenting over conventional stenting with respect to savings in procedural time, contrast load, and fluoroscopy time. Because predilation is not employed, there is an additional saving on angioplasty balloons, and a more efficient and less usage of stents is possible by minimizing the dissection rate. Lesion selection plays a major role in the high success rates. Long, heavily calcified lesions, small vessels or lesions with excessive proximal tortuosity are not considered suitable for direct stenting. With additional experience and continued improvement in stent technology it seems likely that more patients will be potential candidates for direct stenting.

Keywords

Coronary Restenosis, Humans, Stents, Coronary Artery Disease

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!