
Our purpose was to determine the effectiveness of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in the treatment of vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia (VAIN).The study was performed in 30 patients with a mean age of 54 years and previous diagnoses from reviewed records and histopathology slides selected from a group of 65 patients with VAIN from 1980 to 1998. Patients received intravaginal treatment with 5-FU, 1.5 g once weekly for 10 weeks and all patients were followed up for at least 2-years. Papanicolaou smear and colposcopy were performed, as was biopsy when indicated.Twenty eight (93%) patients with VAIN had prior or concurrent anogenital squamous neoplasia, including 5 with invasive cervical carcinoma and 23 with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. In 23 of 30 treated patients (77%), VAIN went into remission after a single treatment; in 3, (10%), it went into remission after two treatment; 3 (10%) had recurrent VAIN 3; and in 1 (3%) it progressed to invasive vaginal cancer. The treatment was well tolerated.The 5-FU is an option choice for VAIN treatment. It is effective, with minimal slide effects. Its use should be confined to treating extensive or multifocal high-grade VAIN.
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Vaginal Smears, Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic, Vaginal Neoplasms, Papilloma, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Middle Aged, Uterine Cervical Dysplasia, Humans, Female, Fluorouracil, Aged, Papanicolaou Test
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Vaginal Smears, Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic, Vaginal Neoplasms, Papilloma, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Middle Aged, Uterine Cervical Dysplasia, Humans, Female, Fluorouracil, Aged, Papanicolaou Test
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
