Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Assessing antigen-specific CD8+ CTL responses in humans.

Authors: Doolan, Denise L.;

Assessing antigen-specific CD8+ CTL responses in humans.

Abstract

Townsend and colleagues (1) were the first to demonstrate, in 1984, that target cells that had been transfected with single viral RNA segments could be specifically recognized by cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL). Recombinant vaccinia viruses that expressed single-gene products were subsequently used to identify major target antigens for CTL (2,3). The demonstration that CTL could recognize transfectants that expressed only fragments of a given target antigen (4) led to the use of overlapping fragments and synthetic peptides to localize epitopes. It was subsequently established that target cells that had been incubated with short synthetic peptides corresponding to the sequence of the influenza virus nucleoprotein (NP) could be specifically recognized by NP-specific CTL in a major histocompatability complex (MHC) class I restricted manner (5,6). Bjorkman et al. (6,7) subsequently resolved the structure of the human class I molecule HLA-A2 by x-ray crystallography and provided evidence of a putative peptide binding site. These studies provided the foundation for characterizing CTL epitopes and CTL responses in many disease systems. Numerous CTL epitopes have been now identified, in all cases recognized in the context of a single human lymphocyte antigen (HLA) allele or family of closely related (HLA degenerate) alleles, and the use of synthetic peptides for defining the types of immune responses induced by experimental vaccination or natural exposure to the target pathogen has been now well documented.

Country
Australia
Keywords

570, Cell Culture Techniques, Leukocytes, Mononuclear, Humans, Indicators and Reagents, Cell Separation, Antigens, Lymphocyte Activation, Peptides, T-Lymphocytes, Cytotoxic

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!