Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Surgical reconstruction of high grade carotid stenosis: a safe procedure?].

Authors: A, Ommer; C, Toenissen; M, Pillny; K, Grabitz; W, Sandmann;

[Surgical reconstruction of high grade carotid stenosis: a safe procedure?].

Abstract

Carotid surgery is still controversial. Some large randomized trials have demonstrated the benefit of surgery in correlation to conservative treatment alone, but these positive results depend on how specific the diagnosis is and a low complication rate. This study presents the results of 2162 patients (male n = 1596 (74%), female n = 566 (26%), mean age 65 +/- 9 years), who underwent carotid surgery between 1990 and 1999. Forth-three percent of these patients had no ipsilateral neurological symptoms with high-grade carotid artery stenosis (Stage I). Thirty-eight percent appeared with prior ipsilateral TIA or PRIND--symptomatology (Stage II) and 19% suffered from stroke with persisting deficits (Stage IV). The operative technique of choice was thromboendarterectomy of the carotid bifurcation with vein-patch closure in 1967 patients (91%). In 1324 patients segmental resection of the internal carotid artery was performed. Carotid endarterectomies and other reconstructions for coronary artery disease including abdominal aortic aneurysm were combined during the same operation in 11% of the patients. The rate of postoperative ipsilateral neurological events was 4.1%. On the ontralateral side neurological symptoms appeared among 0.8%, and 0.4% of the patients had bilateral symptoms. Twenty patients (0.9%) died as a result of postoperative stroke. In relation to preoperative staging of the cerebrovascular occlusive disease in stage I, postoperative neurological symptoms appeared in 2.8% (mortality 0.6%), stage II in 5.7% (mortality 1.0%) and stage IV in 7.8% (mortality 1.2%) of the patients. These results confirm the importance of carotid reconstruction as a measure in the prevention of cerebral infarction in patients with asymptomatic or symptomatic high-grade carotid artery stenosis. The complication rate was lower than the data reported in the literature and the results were clearly better than under conservative treatment alone. In our opinion, the indication for carotid artery reconstruction should be made by a team of vascular surgeons, neurologists and neuroradiologists taking all patient-specific factors into consideration. Only by optimal patient selection and minimal complication rates will a significant benefit for the patient be achieved.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Male, Neurologic Examination, Reoperation, Endarterectomy, Carotid, Cerebral Infarction, Middle Aged, Brain Ischemia, Survival Rate, Postoperative Complications, Humans, Carotid Stenosis, Female, Aged, Follow-Up Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    4
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
4
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!