Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Experimental trachoma.

Authors: P, Vérin;

Experimental trachoma.

Abstract

During half a century, the agent of trachoma could be mainly demonstrated by inoculation to the conjunctiva of animals; by this mean the cycle of the agent could be revealed. There was a huge progress when T'ANG for these studies inoculated embryonated chicken eggs. However, experimentally infected animals are used at present time not only in trachome countries where do not exist laboratories: monkeys, guinea pigs, rabbits, rats and mice allow modern studies of chlamydial infection. Monkeys living in the countries where trachoma is endemic were selected because of their cheapness (orangoutan in Java, macaques in Northern Africa and in Taïwan, baboons in Africa). The monkeys selected by American workers are coming from South America. First pioneers (NICOLLE, CUENOD and NATAF, PAGES, JULIANELLE) have demonstrated the infectivity of animals and the place of the agent of trachoma on taxonomic point of view. As PAGES, we have demonstrated that infection could be regularly provoked when inoculating macaques; moreover a pannus could appear when adding hydrocortison drops or when infiltrating the cornea with tuberculin. Cultures of WEEKS bacilli were introduced in the eyes of trachomatous animals; we could observe an aggravation of the disease. If biology of trachoma is better known at present time, experimental trachoma is until now fundamentally important. It permits immunological studies especially for the purpose of vaccination; one can check terapeutical means for instance antibiotics; studies are performed to demonstrate cross immunizations or enhancement of defence (with levamisole). Experimental trachoma is hitherto and again for a long time commonly requested for the study of trachoma.

Keywords

Trachoma, Bacteriological Techniques, Cell Cycle, Guinea Pigs, Chlamydia trachomatis, Chick Embryo, Haplorhini, Breeding, Conjunctivitis, Inclusion, Rats, Disease Models, Animal, Mice, Animals, Rabbits, Chlamydia

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!