Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Intramedullary osteosynthesis after external fixation.

Authors: S, Paderni; P, Trentani; G, Grippo; G, Bianchi; P B, Squarzina; D, Tigani;

Intramedullary osteosynthesis after external fixation.

Abstract

The authors report the results of a retrospective study conducted on 30 cases of fracture of the tibia and femur submitted to external fixation and subsequently to intramedullary osteosynthesis, treated between 1991 and 1999. Intramedullary osteosynthesis was used in 24 cases (5 in the femur and 19 in the tibia) as treatment subsequent to external fixation for nonunion or delays in consolidation. Sequential nailing was used as planned treatment in the remaining 6 cases. In 83.3% of cases the fracture was open (Gustilo Anderson type I (30%), type II (20%), type III (33.3%). The mean duration of external fixation was 13.24 weeks, and infection occurred in 4 cases (13.33%) during that time. Removal of the external fixator and intramedullary osteosynthesis were carried out during the same surgical session in 40% of the cases, while nailing was preceded by a period in plaster lasting an average of 4 weeks in the remaining 60% of cases. All of the cases achieved consolidation an average of 31 weeks after trauma, and 14.7 weeks after intramedullary synthesis. We observed the occurrence of infection in 3 cases (10%), but this did not keep consolidation from occurring.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Fracture Healing, Male, Adolescent, External Fixators, Osteomyelitis, Middle Aged, Infections, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary, Radiography, Fractures, Open, Postoperative Complications, Fractures, Ununited, Humans, Female, Child, Femoral Fractures, Aged, Follow-Up Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!