Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Porous polyethylene implant for orbital wall reconstruction.

Authors: J C, Choi; C D, Sims; R, Casanova; J W, Shore; M J, Yaremchuk;

Porous polyethylene implant for orbital wall reconstruction.

Abstract

Short-term and intermediate-term results from clinical use of high-density porous polyethylene implants for reconstructive orbital surgery have been encouraging. This article presents an intermediate-term result from one institution with a comprehensive comparative analysis of other available alloplastic materials. A patient survey of 32 cases of orbital reconstruction using porous polyethylene sheet implants was performed, with a mean follow-up period of 32 months (range 15 to 67). All cases were trauma-related injuries. The result was compared with that of published reports of other alloplastic materials with specific emphasis on complication rates. Complication rate following the use of porous polyethylene sheet implants was 6%. This finding was consistent with those of other reports on porous polyethylene sheet implants. A consistent, satisfactory surgical outcome and low complication rate were observed. In the authors' review, the porous polyethylene implants compared favorably in a comparative analysis of other alloplastic materials.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Male, Postoperative Pain, Adolescent, Biocompatible Materials, Prostheses and Implants, Middle Aged, Maxillary Sinusitis, Enophthalmos, Postoperative Complications, Treatment Outcome, Polyethylene, Diplopia, Humans, Female, Orbit, Orbital Fractures, Porosity, Aged, Follow-Up Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!