
The purpose of the study was to measure the axillary temperature at three, six and nine minutes in a hundred children between the ages of one and twelve years who were selected in a non-random deliberate way, and to compare the measurements with the tympanic membrane temperature (golden standard) which was measured in the test persons at the same time. The results were described by sensitivity, specificity, limits of agreement, and predictive values. From some of the findings of the research it is apparent that the axillary temperature reading increased after measurement of three, six and nine minutes. A maximum temperature reading was reached after three minutes in only 9% of the test persons, in 25% after six minutes and in 66% after nine minutes. From the findings it is clear that the ranges that were used influenced the sensitivity of the measurements, and it would appear that the range 35.5 degrees C to 37.2 degrees C was the best range to measure pyrexia in the age group one to 12 years. The 9-minute measurement then had the highest sensitivity. However, the specificity of measurement in this range was lower. The conclusion was drawn that axillary temperature measurement is an acceptable method, with certain reservations, to use as screening method for pyrexia in emergency divisions or clinics.
Time Factors, Tympanic Membrane, Fever, Age Factors, Infant, Sensitivity and Specificity, Body Temperature, Clinical Nursing Research, Nursing Evaluation Research, Thermography, Child, Preschool, Axilla, Humans, Mass Screening, Child, Nursing Assessment
Time Factors, Tympanic Membrane, Fever, Age Factors, Infant, Sensitivity and Specificity, Body Temperature, Clinical Nursing Research, Nursing Evaluation Research, Thermography, Child, Preschool, Axilla, Humans, Mass Screening, Child, Nursing Assessment
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
