Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Methods and specificity of internal medicine specialties in multiphasic screening].

Authors: H, Friedemann; D, Ehrke; U, Krüger; H, Lestin; A, Seifert; H J, Thiele; H J, Tredt;

[Methods and specificity of internal medicine specialties in multiphasic screening].

Abstract

Issuing from the classical definitions for the diagnostic sensitivity and specifity of examination methods in multiphasic screenings is deduced that out of the whole methodical spectre of internal specialities only limited parts are to be applied in multiphasic screenings. At the instance of a multiple multiphasic screenings (model study Sternberg '70) ways to the establishment of reduced optimal parameter combinations are demonstrated. With multivariate statistical methods (facotor analysis, discriminative methods) we succeeded in finding parameter combinations for special groups of diagnosis (liver diseases, hypertension and obesity), by means which these groups in multiphasic screenings are clearly to be differentiated from the healthy symptom-free residual population.

Keywords

Patient Care Team, Time Factors, Cardiovascular Diseases, Interprofessional Relations, Liver Diseases, Hypertension, Humans, Mass Screening, False Positive Reactions, Kidney Diseases, Obesity, False Negative Reactions

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!