Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Percutaneous vertebroplasty].

Authors: J, Hierholzer; C, Depriester; H, Fuchs; S, Venz; K, Maier-Hauff; R, Schulz; K, Koch;

[Percutaneous vertebroplasty].

Abstract

To describe the procedure of percutaneous vertebroplasty and to present our first clinical results of patients treated for benign or malignant painful vertebral body disease.We performed percutaneous vertebroplasty in 31 painful lesions of the spine. Liquid bone cement was injected into the affected vertebral body using fluoroscopic guidance through a bilateral transpedicular approach. Etiology of the bone disease was assessed by biopsy. Pain intensity was assessed before and 1 week after the procedure by standardized catalogue.Percutaneous vertebroplasty was performed in 17 thoracic and in 14 lumbar spine bodies of benign (n = 23) or malignant (n = 8) disease; no clinically relevant complications occurred. All patients reported significant pain relief 1 week after the intervention. One week after treatment, patients were pain-free in 15/31 vertebral bodies, and reported mild residual pain not necessitating narcotic medication in 16/31 cases.In accordance with the literature, percutaneous vertebroplasty proved to be a highly effective, minimal invasive interventional procedure to treat severely painful bone lesions of benign and malignant origin.

Keywords

Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Patient Care Team, Lumbar Vertebrae, Spinal Neoplasms, Palliative Care, Bone Cements, Middle Aged, Thoracic Vertebrae, Humans, Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures, Osteoporosis, Polymethyl Methacrylate, Female, Injections, Spinal, Aged, Pain Measurement

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    31
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
31
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!