Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Esophagogastrostomy. Analysis of 55 cases.

Authors: A D, Boyd; R, Cukingnan; R M, Engelman; S A, Localio; L, Slattery; D A, Tice; J A, Bardin; +1 Authors

Esophagogastrostomy. Analysis of 55 cases.

Abstract

At the New York University Medical Center from January, 1969, through December, 1973, esophagogastrostomies were performed in 56 patients. In 30 (Group A), fundoplications were combined with the esophagogastrostomies; in the other 26 (Group B), esophagogastrostomies only were performed. These two groups have been compared in an effort to determine the effectiveness of fundoplication in preventing gastric reflux following esophagogastrostomy. The operative mortality rate (10 per cent) and the 3 year survival rate (20 per cent) were approximately equal in the two groups. Clinical evidence of reflux was noted in 10 per cent of Group A and 47 per cent of Group B patients, while complications of reflux were noted in 5 per cent of Group A and in 33 per cent of Group B patients. The results of the present study suggest that fundoplication, while not prolonging survival, does prevent the symptoms and complications of gastric reflux and improves the quality of survival in these unfortunate patients. This leads us to recommend the routine use of fundoplication with esophagogastrostomy in patients with carcinoma of the esophagus and gastric cardia.

Keywords

Adult, Gastrostomy, Male, Esophageal Neoplasms, Adenocarcinoma, Middle Aged, Stomach Neoplasms, Esophagoplasty, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, Gastroesophageal Reflux, Humans, Female, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    36
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
36
Average
Top 1%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!