Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Cytomegalovirus sensitivity to anti-retroviral agents in patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virus with chorioretinitis in Spain].

Authors: M A, Cañizares; I, Losada; M J, Pérez-Elías; J, González; R, Rubio; J L, Casado; A, Guerrero;

[Cytomegalovirus sensitivity to anti-retroviral agents in patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virus with chorioretinitis in Spain].

Abstract

To determine the prevalence of the in vitro resistance rate of cytomegalovirus (CMV) to gancyclovir (GCV) and foscarnet (FOS) among patients with AIDS and chorioretinitis. Furthermore, in vitro sensitivity results were compared with the clinical response to therapy.Thirty-six patients with the diagnosis of CMV retinitis and AIDS were included in the study. Antiviral sensitivity testing was performed to 51 clinical CMV strains from these patients. The in vitro sensitivity was compared with the clinical response to therapy. The resistance criteria were the inhibitory dose50 (ID50) GCV > 5 M and ID50 FOS > 400 M.None of the CMV tested strains was resistant to GCV or FOS; however, six patients who had relapses of chorioretinitis while on maintenance therapy and isolation during the condition had mean ID50 of strains (n=8) of 1,95 M for GCV (standard deviation [SD] of 0.71) and 115.2 for FOS (SD, 34.7). These patients responded well when drugs were used at induction doses.The in vitro sensitivity testing is not a good predictor of infection control when the drug is used at maintenance doses. This suggests that these strains should be classified in the intermediate resistant category.

Keywords

Adult, Male, AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections, Cytomegalovirus, HIV Infections, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Middle Aged, Antiviral Agents, Chorioretinitis, Spain, Cytomegalovirus Infections, Humans, Female, Ganciclovir, Foscarnet

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!