Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Long-term results with the Biocor-SJM stentless porcine aortic bioprosthesis.

Authors: Mario, Vrandecic; Fernando Antonio, Fantini; Bayard Gontijo, Filho; OliveiraOzananCésar, de; CostaJúniorIdailMartins, da; Erika, Vrandecic;

Long-term results with the Biocor-SJM stentless porcine aortic bioprosthesis.

Abstract

The study aim was to update the clinical analysis of hemodynamic performance, structural failure and survival in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR) with a composite aortic, aldehyde tanned, stentless porcine bioprosthesis.Between January 1990 and March 2001, 247 patients underwent AVR with aortic stentless valves. Patient demographic and clinical analysis included age, sex, valve lesion, valve size, pre- and postoperative NYHA class, hospital morbidity, mortality, operative data and duration of hospitalization.Mean patient age was 47.3 years; 71% of patients were males, and 45% had aortic insufficiency. The incidence of rheumatic heart disease requiring surgery was 41.7%. In 23% of patients surgery was indicated due to aortic stented bioprosthetic dysfunction. Preoperatively, 81% of patients were in NYHA classes III and IV. Mean follow up was 5.9+/-2.8 years (range: 1 month to 11.4 years); total follow up was 1,392 patient-years (98% complete). The valve size used was < or =25 mm in 75.3% of patients. The mean intensive care unit stay was 2.6 days; mean hospital stay was 10.7 days. Hospital mortality was 4.0% and late death 6.1%. There were no valve-related deaths. Postoperatively, the mean aortic effective orifice area (EOA) was 1.71 cm2, the mean peak transvalvular gradient 17.1 mmHg, and the mean transvalvular gradient 9.0 mmHg; the left ventricular mass index (g/m2) was 174 and 117 before and after surgery respectively. The rate of leaflet tissue degeneration was 0.9%, and seen as mild by echocardiographic follow up. Actuarial survival at almost 12 years was 91%, and freedom from reoperations was approximately 99%.Patients with aortic stentless valves have hemodynamic benefits seen as larger aortic EOA, low transvalvular gradients, satisfactory left ventricular remodeling with significant reduction of left ventricular mass, low complication rate, low reoperation rate, lower leaflet tissue degeneration rate, and no valve-related mortality. A longer follow up is required to confirm these benefits.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Bioprosthesis, Male, Reoperation, Aortic Valve Insufficiency, Suture Techniques, Hemodynamics, Aortic Valve Stenosis, Middle Aged, Echocardiography, Doppler, Survival Rate, Treatment Outcome, Aortic Valve, Heart Valve Prosthesis, Humans, Female, Aged, Follow-Up Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    9
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
9
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!