
Rationale for the treatment of cartilage damage in younger patients depends on a thorough understanding of the predisposing factors for the chondrosis and the stage of disease. Implantation with autologous cultured chondrocytes allows for resurfacing of larger defect areas with reproducibly good/excellent results in 90% of patients with isolated lesions of the femoral condyle. Patellar lesions also may be successfully treated (approximately 75% improved) but strict attention must be given to correction of malalignment. Results in patients with tibial and salvage lesions are encouraging; however, these results should be viewed with caution due to the small number of patients with 2-year follow-up. Autologous chondrocyte implantation involves an open technique with the inherent disadvantages of adhesions and a more prolonged recovery. However, these disadvantages must be weighed against the procedure's ability to produce a hyaline-type tissue with greater durability than fibrocartilage repairs produced by traditional marrow-stimulation techniques. We recommended matching the treatment procedure to patient expectations and lesion/demographic characteristics. Based on the available literature. algorithms have been published that recommend autologous chondrocyte implantation be reserved as first-line treatment for high-demand patients with large lesions (>2 cm2) and as revision therapy in patients with lesions of all sizes, regardless of patient demand, who have failed alternative marrow stimulation techniques.
Cartilage, Articular, Chondrocytes, Treatment Outcome, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Humans, Knee Injuries, Transplantation, Autologous, Algorithms, United States
Cartilage, Articular, Chondrocytes, Treatment Outcome, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Humans, Knee Injuries, Transplantation, Autologous, Algorithms, United States
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
