Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

[Radiofrequency ablation].

Authors: H, Hidaka; S, Kokubu; K, Ono;

[Radiofrequency ablation].

Abstract

RF interstitial thermal ablation (RFA) has yielded satisfactory results in the treatment of both primary and secondary hepatic tumors with no serious complications. We describe our experience with 163 patients who had this treatment. We used the RITA Needle electrode (model 30; four hooks, model 70; seven hooks) in 101 cases, the LeVeen Needle electrode in 32 cases and the Cool-tips type electrode in 30 cases. Post treatment tumor necrosis was evaluated by dynamic CT or SPIO MRI in all cases. The mean number of RFA sessions to complete tumor nodule treatment was 1.2 (1 session; 85%, 2 sessions; 12%, more than 3 sessions 3%). The mean complete necrosis area of single ablation with RITA Needle electrode was 31.3 +/- 6.1 mm x 29.6 +/- 5.5 mm. Seventy-two patients were followed up for 6-24 months (means; 15.2 months). Of these patients, 4 (5.6%) showed local recurrence. No fatal or major complications related to the treatment or to the diagnostic procedure were observed. In one of 163 patients, a moderate-to-large pleural effusion was documented after RFA, and resolved by drainage. In conclusion, RF interstitial thermal ablation of hepatic tumor is a safe and effective technique for hepatic tumors.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Male, Carcinoma, Hepatocellular, Liver Neoplasms, Catheter Ablation, Humans, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!